“金融安全”的司法表达  

The Judicial Expression of“Financial Security”

作　　者：黄韬 HUANG Ta(Guanghua Law School,Zhejiang University)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2020年第4期68-82,193,共16页The Jurist

摘　　要："金融安全"虽非严格意义上的法律概念,但在我国法院的司法文件和司法裁判文书中一直被广泛使用,其原因在于:其一,法院需要确认自身作为国家整体政治(政权)架构中的重要组成部分;其二,法院正当化自由裁量权的行使;其三,为创制金融法律规则提供外部条件。由此,"金融安全"的话语表述成为了现实中的司法"润滑剂",同时也一定程度上展示了我国金融司法的主要运行特征:首先,"金融安全"话语在某些场景中有可能弱化司法自由裁量权的外部约束;其次,除了涉及政策性的不良金融债权处置案件之外,"金融安全"话语现实中并不构成司法领域中"所有制歧视"的基础;最后,"金融安全"话语持续扮演着公共政策向司法政策转化过程中"桥梁"的角色,但也埋下了以司法稳定性为代价的隐忧。Although"financial security"is not a legal concept in the strict sense,it has been widely used in judicial documents and judicial adjudications of Chinese courts.The reasons are as follows:First,the courts need to confirm that they are in the overall political(power)structure of the country.Secondly,the court justifies the exercise of discretion;thirdly,it provides external conditions for creating financial legal rules.As a result,the discourse expression of"financial security"has become a judicial"lubricant",and it has also demonstrated the main characteristics of China’s financial judiciary to a certain extent.First,the"financial security"discourse in some scenarios may weaken the external constraints on judicial discretion;secondly,except for cases involving the disposition of non-performing financial claims,the discourse of"financial security"does not actually constitute the basis of"discrimination of ownership"throughout the judiciary;finally,"financial security"discourse continues to play the role of"bridge"in the transition from public policy to judicial policy,but it also lays hidden concerns at the expense of judicial stability.

关 键 词：金融安全 金融监管 金融争议 司法行为 司法改革 

分 类 号：D922.28[政治法律—经济法学]