检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张焕增 Zhang Huanzeng(Jinan Rail Trasit Group Co.,Ltd.,Jinan 250002,China)
出 处:《铁路通信信号工程技术》2020年第7期46-50,共5页Railway Signalling & Communication Engineering
摘 要:漏缆作为城市轨道交通TD-LTE车地无线通信主流传输介质,具有传输信号稳定、覆盖均匀、敷设距离远等优点,但其价格较贵,因此敷设单漏缆还是双漏缆需要深入研究,通过对多个应用场景可靠性方面进行深入比较分析,确定了不同车地无线方案所采用的漏缆敷设方式,综合考虑价格及可靠性因素,给出综合承载场景下应采用漏缆敷设方式,建议单独承载信号系统情况下地下段宜采用单漏缆,高架段宜采用双漏缆敷设方式.As the main transmission medium of TD-LTE train-wayside wireless communication of urban rail transit,leaky cable has the advantages of stable transmission signal,uniform coverage,long laying distance,etc.,but its price is relatively expensive.Therefore,laying single leaky cable or double leaky cable needs to be studied in depth.In this paper,through in-depth comparative analysis on the reliability of multiple application scenarios,the laying mode of leaky cable adopted by different trainwayside wireless schemes is determined.Considering the factors of price and reliability,it is suggested to adopt the laying mode of leaky cable in the comprehensive bearing scenario,single leaky cable in the underground section and double leaky cable in the elevated section in the case of single bearing signaling system.
分 类 号:U231.7[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15