检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高建平 Gao Jianping
机构地区:[1]深圳大学美学与文艺批评研究院,广东深圳518061
出 处:《学术研究》2020年第7期145-151,178,共8页Academic Research
摘 要:20世纪西方文学理论,是从偏离作者中心开始的。在其发展过程中,至少出现了两种倾向:一是围绕对文学作品的解读,出现了意义从作者到文本再到读者的转移过程;二是以文学研究为平台,在文化研究的号召下,走向对社会和政治问题的关注,从而建立了"没有文学的文学理论",使"文学理论"研究变成"理论"研究。到了世纪之交,"理论"破产,"理论之后"时代来临。在"后理论"时代,理论向文学回归,只有回到对文学活动和实践的研究,才是文学理论的出路。In the West, twentieth-century literary theory started with the deviation from author-centered approaches. Over the course of its evolution, there have been at least two major trends. First, the interpretation of literary works underwent a transfer of meaning from the author to the text and the reader. Second, on the basis of their study of literature, literary theorists shifted their attention to social and political issues under the influence of "cultural studies", and went so far as to construct a"literary theory without literature", which transformed the study of "literary theory" into that of "theory" alone. At the turn of the century, there began the era of "after theory" with the collapse of "theory". In the present article, I argue that the future of literary theory lies in the research on literary practice.
关 键 词:西方文论 文本中心论 “没有文学的文学理论” “理论之后”
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7