FDI方式选择及其对中国绿色技术创新的影响——基于采掘业数据的经验分析  

Choice of FDI Method and Its Impact on China’s Green Technology Innovation:An Empirical Analysis Based on Extractive Industry

作　　者：黄小勇[1] 刘斌斌 Huang Xiaoyong;Liu Binbin

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学财政金融学院

出　　处：《宏观经济研究》2020年第7期114-123,175,共11页Macroeconomics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“企业技术创新模式选择及其金融资源错配纠偏机制设计与路径优化对策研究”(17BJY035)的资助。

摘　　要：基于逆向选择理论对中国采掘业FDI是否存在"资源掠夺"效应、进入方式选择以及因此所产生的绿色技术溢出效应进行理论分析的基础上,本文以2012—2016年省际面板数据为样本进行实证检验。研究结果表明:进入中国的采掘业FDI存在明显的"资源掠夺"效应,且更倾向于以合资方式进入资源丰裕地区;不同进入方式对中国绿色技术创新差异化影响明显,虽然采掘业FDI整体上有利于中国绿色技术创新水平的提升,但以合资方式进入会产生严格负的绿色技术溢出。基于所得研究结论,最后提出政策建议。Based on the theory of adverse selection, based on the theoretical analysis of whether there is a ‘resource pillage’ effect, the choice of entry mode, and the green technology spillover effect of FDI in the Chinese extractive industry, this paper uses the inter-provincial panel data from 2012 to 2016 as an empirical test. The research results show that the FDI entering the extractive industries in China has a clear ‘resource pillage’ effect, and it is more inclined to enter the resource-rich areas through joint ventures. Different entry modes have a significant impact on the differentiation of China’s green technology innovation. Although FDI in the extractive industry as a whole is conducive to the improvement of China’s green technology innovation level, entry through joint ventures will produce strictly negative green technology spillovers. Based on the conclusions of the research, policy suggestions are finally made.

关 键 词：资源掠夺 FDI进入方式 绿色技术创新 

分 类 号：F832.6[经济管理—金融学] F426.1[环境科学与工程—环境科学] X22