检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘英俊 LIU Ying-jun(Zhuhai Branch of Beijing Normal University,Zhuhai Guangdong 519087,China)
出 处:《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2020年第3期5-7,共3页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
摘 要:在民事公益诉讼案件中,检察机关行使民事抗诉权存在当事人角色与诉讼监督者角色相冲突问题。检察机关一身两任,从根本上解决角色冲突是不可能的。但是,只要进行适当安排,角色冲突在一定条件下可以有所消解。为此,采取相对合理主义的立场,在强化检察官客观义务的同时,保留检察机关在民事公益诉讼中二审抗诉权,限制检察机关不利于被告的再审抗诉权的提起,应为协调检察机关角色冲突的最可行办法。In civil public interest litigation cases,there exists the conflict between the role of the party and the role of the litigation supervisor in the procuratorial organ’s exercise of civil protest right. It is impossible for the procuratorial organ to solve the role conflict fundamentally. However,role conflicts can be resolved under certain conditions as long as they are properly arranged. Therefore,the most feasible way to coordinate the role conflict of procuratorial organs should be to adopt the position of relative rationalism,to strengthen the objective duty of procurators,to retain the procuratorial organs’ right of protest of second instance in civil public interest litigation,and to restrict the prosecution of the right of retrial protest against the defendant.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7