检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何晓俊 郭小鹏 He Xiaojun;Guo Xiaopeng(Department of Radiology,Wuhan Children's Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Wuhan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital),Hubei Wuhan 430015,China;Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Hubei Wuhan 430022,China)
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉儿童医院(武汉市妇幼保健院)放射科,湖北武汉430015 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院,湖北武汉430022
出 处:《现代肿瘤医学》2020年第16期2841-2845,共5页Journal of Modern Oncology
摘 要:目的:比较经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)序贯微波消融术(MWA)或射频消融术(RFA)治疗原发性肝癌的疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析武汉协和医院接受治疗的原发性肝癌患者70例,将其分为TACE+MWA组36例与TACE+RFA组34例,比较两组临床疗效、生存率、肿瘤体积、血供消失率、完全坏死率、甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)水平、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)水平以及不良反应发生率。结果:TACE+MWA组疾病控制率(91.67%)与TACE+RFA组(88.24%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组肿瘤体积、血供消失率、完全坏死率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后两组AFP水平与治疗前比较均明显降低(P<0.05),组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后两组ALT、AST水平与治疗前比较均明显升高(P<0.05),且组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组6个月、1年、3年生存率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:TACE序贯MWA或RFA治疗原发性肝癌,疾病控制率、生存率、血供消失率与完全坏死率等无明显差异,均能有效控制肿瘤发展,促进AFP、ALT、AST等因子水平恢复至正常范围,延长生存期,且安全性尚可,临床可替换使用,但TACE+MWA组治疗后应注意加强保肝治疗。Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)sequential microwave ablation(MWA)or radiofrequency ablation(RFA)in the treatment of primary liver cancer.Methods:70 patients with primary liver cancer patients treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed,and they were divided into TACE+MWA group(36 cases)and TACE+RFA group(34 cases).The clinical efficacy,survival rate,tumor volume,blood supply disappearance rate,total necrosis rate,alpha fetoprotein(AFP)level,alanine aminotransferase(ALT)level,aspartate aminotransferase(AST)level,and the incidence rate of adverse reaction were compared in the two groups.Results:There was no significant difference in disease control rate between TACE+MWA group(91.67%)with TACE+RFA group(88.24%)(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in tumor volume,blood supply disappearance rate and complete necrosis rate between the two groups(P>0.05).AFP levels in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.05).And there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the levels of ALT and AST in the two groups were significantly higher than those before treatment(P<0.05),and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the survival rate between the two groups at 6 months,1 year and 3 years(P>0.05).Conclusion:There was no significant difference in disease control rate,survival rate,blood supply disappearance rate and complete necrosis rate between TACE sequential MWA or RFA treatment of primary liver cancer.They can effectively control the development of tumor,promote the levels of AFP,ALT,AST and other factors to return to normal range,prolong the survival time,and the have available safety.However,TACE+MWA group should pay attention to strengthening liver protection treatment after treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.38.243