检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:白蕊 关辉[1] BAI Rui;GUAN Hui(Plastic Surgery&Burn Department,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学第一医院整形烧伤外科,北京100034
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2020年第21期183-186,共4页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨头面部恶性肿瘤切除皮瓣修复术患者综合护理干预的效果。方法在北京市某三甲医院选取100例行头面部恶性肿瘤切除皮瓣修复治疗的患者,用随机数字表法分为干预组和对照组各50例,对照组患者行常规护理,干预组患者应用综合护理干预。比较两组患者的改善有效率、护理满意度、生活自理能力、依从性以及生活质量。结果干预组的症状改善有效率、护理满意度、生活自理能力、依从性以及生活质量显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论头面部恶性肿瘤切除皮瓣修复术患者的综合护理干预措施可以改善患者的治疗效果和自理能力,同时提高患者的满意度、依从性和生活质量。Objective To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention for patients with head and face malignant tumors with flap repair. Methods 100 patients underwent skin flap repair for head and face malignant tumors were selected in a top three hospital in Beijing. Random number table method was used to divide them into intervention group and control group, 50 cases each. Patients in control group received routine nursing, and patients in intervention group applied comprehensive nursing intervention. The improvement efficiency, nursing satisfaction, life selfcare ability, compliance and quality of life of the two groups of patients were compared. Results The symptoms improvement efficiency, nursing satisfaction, life self-care ability, compliance and quality of life of the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing interventions for patients with head and face malignant tumor resection flap repair can improve the patient’s treatment effect and self-care ability. At the same time to improve patient satisfaction, compliance and quality of life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117