检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张登[1] 李静[1] 刘丽[1] ZHANG Deng;LI Jing;LIU Li(The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Sun Yat sen University,Guangdong Guangzhou 510000,China)
机构地区:[1]广东中山大学附属第一医院,广东广州510000
出 处:《临床医药文献电子杂志》2020年第51期9-9,15,共2页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature
摘 要:目的分析肠造口护理中实施延续性护理的具体方法与效果情况。方法研究资料均出自本院,是在2015年11月~2016年12月期间收治的60例全膀胱切除回肠代膀胱造口患者,将全部患者按照平均分的方式分为两组:观察组与对照组,每组患者有30例。其中对照组实施常规护理干预,观察组实施延续护理干预,干预后比较两组患者的护理效果。结果在生活质量方面两组进行比较,观察组显著优于对照组,经比较,有显著的统计学意义(P<0.05)。比较两组患者的不良反应发生率,观察组显著低于对照组,经比较,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论对造口患者实施延伸护理干预措施,取得了理想的治疗效果,因此这种护理模式是非常有价值的。Objective To analyze the specific method and effect of continuous nursing in stoma nursing.Methods All the research materials were from our hospital.From November 2015 to December 2016,60 patients with stoma were admitted.All the patients were divided into two groups according to the way of average score:the observation group and the control group,with 30 patients in each group.Among them,routine nursing intervention was carried out in the control group,and continuous nursing intervention was carried out in the observation group.Results Compared with the control group,the quality of life in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Extended nursing intervention for patients with stoma has achieved ideal therapeutic effect,so this nursing mode is very valuable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229