机构地区:[1]扬州大学附属泰兴人民医院肿瘤放疗科,泰兴225400 [2]南京医科大学附属苏州医院肿瘤放疗科,苏州215002 [3]苏州大学附属第一医院肿瘤放疗科,215006 [4]南京师范大学泰州学院数学系,泰州225300
出 处:《国际肿瘤学杂志》2020年第5期278-283,共6页Journal of International Oncology
基 金:苏州市肿瘤临床医学中心项目(Szzx201506)。
摘 要:目的探索除TNM分期外的临床病理因素,包括术前肿瘤体积、长度及最大直径对胸段食管鳞状细胞癌预后的影响,并以列线图(nomogram)的方式评价有统计学意义的临床病理变量预测总生存率的情况。方法回顾性分析2011—2014年在扬州大学附属泰兴人民医院胸外科接受食管癌根治术的296例患者,根据术前肿瘤体积、长度及最大直径的最佳临界值进行分组,采用Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率并行log-rank检验,应用Cox模型单因素及多因素分析临床变量与生存预后的关系,最终纳入有统计学意义的临床病理参数建立列线图模型,并通过校准曲线图、一致性指数(C-index)和决策曲线图进一步验证该模型的预测价值。结果经X-tile分析确定术前肿瘤体积的最佳临界值为32 cm^3和72 cm^3,肿瘤体积<32 cm^3(n=94)、32~72 cm^3(n=118)和>72 cm^3(n=84)的3组患者1、3、5年生存率分别为100%、84.0%、68.1%,98.3%、42.4%、24.6%和94.1%、25.0%、7.1%(χ2=86.639,P<0.001);肿瘤长度的最佳临界值为3.0 cm和5.0 cm,肿瘤长度<3.0 cm(n=62)、3.0~5.0 cm(n=146)和>5.0 cm(n=88)的3组患者1、3、5年生存率分别为99.5%、87.1%、69.4%,98.6%、47.9%、30.1%和94.3%、29.6%、13.6%(χ2=53.607,P<0.001);肿瘤最大直径的最佳临界值为2.5 cm和3.5 cm,肿瘤最大直径<2.5 cm(n=51)、2.5~3.5 cm(n=121)和>3.5 cm(n=124)的3组患者1、3、5年生存率分别为99.5%、84.3%、74.5%,98.3%、57.0%、36.4%和96.0%、29.0%、13.7%(χ2=62.109,P<0.001)。单因素分析结果显示,肿瘤位置、分化程度、T分期、N分期、TNM分期、辅助治疗、术前肿瘤体积、长度及最大直径均与胸段食管鳞状细胞癌患者的总生存期(OS)密切相关(均P<0.05)。Cox多因素分析结果显示,分化程度(HR=0.514,95%CI为0.366~0.723,P=0.019)、TNM分期(HR=1.757,95%CI为1.267~2.612,P=0.015)、辅助治疗(HR=0.669,95%CI为0.503~0.889,P=0.006)和术前肿瘤体积(将<32 cm^3设为哑变量,32~72 cm^3:HR=3.689,95%CI为2.415~5.6Objective To explore the influence of clinicopathological factors besides TNM stage,including preoperative tumor volume,length and maximum diameter,on survival prognosis of patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC),and to evaluate the predictive survival rate of clinicopathological variables with statistical significance by nomogram.Methods A total of 296 patients with ESCC treated by radical resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Affiliated Taixing People's Hospital of Yangzhou University from 2011 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed.These patients were grouped for further analysis according to the optimal threshold of preoperative tumor volume,length and maximum diameter.Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rate and survival comparison was performed by log-rank test.The univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to analyze the relationships between clinical variables and survival prognosis.Finally,nomogram model was established by integrating statistically significant clinicopathological parameters,and the predictive value of this model was further verified by calibration curve,concordance index(C-index)and decision curve.Results The optimal thresholds of preoperative tumor volume were 32 cm^3 and 72 cm^3 by X-tile analysis,and among the patients whose tumor volume was<32 cm^3(n=94),the 1-,3-and 5-year survival rates were 100%,84.0%and 68.1%;in the 32-72 cm^3 group(n=118),the 1-,3-and 5-year survival rates were 98.3%,42.4%and 24.6%;in the>72 cm^3 group(n=84),the 1-,3-and 5-year survival rates were 94.1%,25.0 and 7.1%(χ2=86.639,P<0.001).The optimal cutoff values of tumor length were 3.0 cm and 5.0 cm,and among the patients with tumor length<3.0 cm(n=62),the 1-,3-,and 5-year survival rates were 99.5%,87.1%and 69.4%;in the 3.0-5.0 cm group(n=146),the 1-,3-,and 5-year survival rates were 98.6%,47.9%and 30.1%;in the>5.0 cm group(n=88),the 1-,3-,and 5-year survival rates were 94.3%,29.6%,13.6%,respectively(χ2=53.607,P<0.001).The thresholds of tumor maximum dia
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...