宫颈癌根治术后不放置盆腔引流可行性研究  

Feasibility study of no tube drainage after radical hysterectomy of cervical cancer

作　　者：井明杰 张海凤[2] 刘玉珍[2] 王新波 吕秀萍[2] JING Mingjie;ZHANG Haifeng;LIU Yuzhen;WANG Xinbo;LV Xiuping(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Weifang Medical University,Weifang 261053,China;Department of Gynecology,the Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University)

机构地区：[1]潍坊医学院妇产科学教研室,山东潍坊261053 [2]潍坊医学院附属医院妇科

出　　处：《潍坊医学院学报》2020年第2期131-133,共3页Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang

摘　　要：目的探讨宫颈癌患者根治术后不放置盆腔引流对患者术后康复的影响。方法选择2018年5月~2019年5月因宫颈癌行腹腔镜下根治术治疗的患者36例,随机分为不放引流组16例,放置引流组20例。分别观察并比较患者术后病率、盆腔感染、腹胀、下肢深静脉血栓(LEDVT)、淋巴囊肿、尿潴留等并发症发生率、排气时间、术后住院天数。结果两组患者术后病率、淋巴囊肿、尿潴留、腹胀、盆腔感染、LEDVT等并发症发生率,差异均无显著性(P均>0.05);术后住院天数及术后排气时间比较,差异亦无显著性(P均>0.05)。结论宫颈癌患者根治术后,不放置盆腔引流不增加患者术后各种并发症的发生率,选择不放置盆腔引流是可行的。Objective To explore the postoperative rehabilitation effect of no radical drainage in patients with cervical cancer radical hysterectomy.Methods A total of 36 patients with laparoscopic cervical cancer radical hysterectomy from May 2018 to May 2019 were randomly divided into no tube drainage group(n=16)and tube drainage group(n=20).The postoperative morbidity,pelvic infection,abdominal distension,lower extremity deep vein thrombosis(LEDVT),lymphatic cyst,urinary retention and other complications were observed and compared.Results No significant differences were found in these indicators above between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion For patients received cervical cancer radical hysterectomy,the postoperative complications will not increase,so that it is feasible to choose not to place pelvic drainage.

关 键 词：宫颈癌根治术 盆腔引流 术后病率 快速康复外科 

分 类 号：R737.33[医药卫生—肿瘤]