检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐歌[1,2] XU Ge(School of Foreign Languages,Huaqiao University,Quanzhou 362021,China;Center for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics,Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou 510420,China)
机构地区:[1]华侨大学外国语学院,福建泉州362021 [2]广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心,广州510420
出 处:《唐山学院学报》2020年第4期85-91,97,共8页Journal of Tangshan University
基 金:福建省社会科学规划项目青年项目(FJ2018C095)。
摘 要:通过对比实验组和对照组的词汇知识量表得分,考察先后9次建构式词汇联想任务对中国大学生二语新词习得的影响。研究发现:实验组在整体词、刺激词及干扰词的词汇深度层面均显著高于对照组(p<0.05);名词、动词、形容词三种词性对实验组和对照组组内的词汇深度影响没有明显区别。研究结果表明,借助建构式词汇联想,二语学习者对新词进行有意识的主动加工,促使新词合理地融入旧词网络系统中,从而加深词汇深度。By comparing the scores of Vocabulary Knowledge Scale(VKS)between experimental group and control group,this paper tried to discover the impact of nine constructive word association tests on the depth of newly acquired second language words for Chinese college students.It was found that the lexical depth of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group in terms of stimulus words,noise words and the overall words tested(p<0.05),and the noun,verb and adjective didn’t exert obvious influence on the lexical depth within each group.The results show that the L2 learners intentionally conduct a active processing of the novel words via the constructive word association method,which promotes the natural assimilation of the novel words in the network of the old ones.In this way,the lexical depth is strengthened.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249