防卫限度的司法异化:现实动因及其抑制路径  

Judicial Alienation of Defense Limits:Realistic Motivation and Its Inhibition Path

作　　者：张健一[1] 王凯璇 赵芳 ZHANG Jian-yi;WANG Kai-xuan;ZHAO Fang(Jiangsu Police College,Jiangsu Nanjing 210012;Huzhou Intermediate People s Court of Zhejiang Province,Zhejiang Huzhou 313000)

机构地区：[1]江苏警官学院,江苏南京210012 [2]浙江省湖州市中级人民法院刑二庭,浙江湖州313000

出　　处：《山西警察学院学报》2020年第3期17-20,共4页Journal of Shanxi Police College

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“刑法机能视角下的故意概念与内容研究”(17YJC820067);江苏高校“青蓝工程”资助项目;“十三五”江苏省重点学科建设工程资助项目;江苏警官学院青年博士创新团队资助项目;江苏省大学生实践创新创业训练计划项目“主体意识强化背景下防卫限度实证研究”(201910329060Y)。

摘　　要：实证研究表明,关于正当防卫的限度,当下的司法实操与立法本旨各行其是。正当防卫限度的司法异化已成事实。造成这种现象的现实动因错综复杂,大致可以归结为微观层面“失焦”的媒体报道、驳杂的公众评价性认知与专业槽的冲突,中观层面“变了味”的绩效考核,宏观层面对“法律治理化”的期许。在立足中观层面探索抑制防卫限度实践异化的路径时,重在对正当防卫领域案件的上诉率、抗诉率、信访率、改判率等指标做细致的技术性处理,在遵循“行为责任原理”的同时防范考核指标失控的风险。Empirical research shows that the current judicial practice and the legislative purpose of the current judicial practice and legislative principles have their waysconcerning the limits of legitimate defense.The judicial alienation of justifiable defense limits has become a fact.The realistic causes for this phenomenon are complex,which can be roughly attributed to the“out of focus”media report at the micro-level,the mixed public appraisal cognition and the conflict between professional slot.The“so-called”performance appraisal at the medium level and the expectation of“legal governance”at the macro level.Expectations for“legal governance”.From the perspective of the middle level,we should focus on the careful technical treatment of the indexes such as appeal rate,protest rate,petition rate and judgment change rate in the field of justifiable defense,so as to follow the“principle of behavioral responsibility”and prevent the risk of the evaluation index getting out of control.

关 键 词：防卫限度 绩效考核 法律治理化 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]