检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汤维建[1,2] Tang Weijian
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心
出 处:《中国法学》2020年第4期240-260,共21页China Legal Science
基 金:2018年度北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心重点项目;北京市社会科学基金重点项目“中国特色社会主义程序法治研究”(项目批准号:18KDAL027)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:我国《民事诉讼法》引入类似必要共同诉讼从而完善我国的必要共同诉讼制度已属必然。从发展趋势看,类似必要共同诉讼正在从狭义转向广义、从传统转向现代、从一元转向多元,其范围也随之不断扩大。就类似必要共同诉讼的适用机制而言,有必要将类似必要共同诉讼分为诉讼标的同一型和诉讼标的牵连型、原告型和被告型以及既判力全面扩张型和既判力局部扩张型等类型,对其识别以诉讼标的具有共同性或牵连性为客观标准,同时辅之以立法上的除外标准。在此基础上,对《民法典》等制定法上的类似必要共同诉讼进行辨析,提出若干条款作为《民事诉讼法》的修法建言。It is necessary for the Civil Procedure Law to introduce similar necessary joint action so as to perfect China’s necessary joint action system. From the development trend, similar necessary joint action is changing from narrow sense to broad sense, from traditional to modern, from monism to pluralism, and its scope is also expanding. As far as the applicable mechanism of similar necessary joint action is concerned, it is necessary to divide the similar necessary joint action into the following types: the type of same object of action and the type of implicated object of action, the plaintiff type and the defendant type, and the general expansion type of res judicata and the partial expansion type of res judicata, the standard of its identification is the objective standard of the commonness or implicitness of the object of action, supplemented by the exception standard in legislation. On this basis, this paper analyzes the similar necessary joint action in the statutory laws, such as the Civil Code. Some articles are put forward as suggestions for the amendment of Civil Procedure Law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28