检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:佘艺颖[1] 肖淞元 She Yiying;Xiao Songyuan
机构地区:[1]长沙学院 [2]中南大学湘雅二医院
出 处:《医学与法学》2020年第4期19-24,共6页Medicine and Jurisprudence
基 金:长沙市哲学社会科学规划项目“新经济下长沙市工伤认定难题与对策研究”(项目编号:2020csskktzc33)阶段性成果。
摘 要:"工伤"法定概念的缺位及其与"职业病""职业传染病"概念间的模糊性所致实务部门理解上的偏差、工伤认定一般条款的缺失以及《职业病分类与目录》对职业性传染病认定的封闭性等,使传染病工伤认定的法律适用颇为困窘。鉴此,工伤认定立法应明确细化工伤认定的核心标准,并采用一般条款与列举条款相结合的立法技术,适时对《职业病分类和目录》设计兜底条款等,以保障接触传染病病原体工作的劳动者的权益。Due to the absence of legal concept of′work-related injury′,practical departments understanding deviation caused by the ambiguity among concepts of work-related injury,occupational diseases and infectious occu⁃pational diseases,the absence of general provisions for the determination of work-related injury,and the closed na⁃ture of occupational disease determination in Classification and Catalogue of Occupational Diseases,there is a dilem⁃ma for legal application of work-related injury determination.In view of this,the legislation on the identification of industrial injuries should clearly specify the core standards for the identification of work-related injury,and adopt the legislative technology combining the general terms and enumerated terms,and timely design the provisions for Classification and Catalogue of Occupational Diseases,so as to protect the rights and interests of the workers ex⁃posed to the pathogen of infectious diseases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.185.110