检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龚傲霜 GONG Aoshuang(School of Law,Anhui University,Hefei 230601,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽大学法学院,合肥230601
出 处:《四川职业技术学院学报》2020年第4期8-13,共6页Journal of Sichuan Vocational and Technical College
摘 要:严格排除非法证据规则的出台,为排除非法证据辩护带来了良好的司法环境,我国虽没有正式确立有效辩护的规定,但是引入有效辩护理念有利于辩护律师恪尽职守,充分保障非法取证案件中被告人的权利救济。严格排除非法证据新规则申明了律师进一步可辩护的范围,中国司法理论与实践的不断完善证明我国确有引入有效辩护理论的必要,辩护律师应协调当事人和法院做好配合工作,在具体排除非法证据程序中实现有效辩护。The strict rule of excluding illegal evidence has brought a good judicial environment for the defense of excluding illegal evidence.Although there is no formal regulation of effective defense in China,the introduction of effective defense concept is conducive to the defense lawyers'conscientious duty,and can fully protect the defendant's right relief in the case of illegal evidence collection.The new rule of strictly excluding illegal evidence states the scope of lawyers'further defense.The continuous improvement of China's judicial theory and practice proves the necessity of introducing effective defense theory.Defense lawyers should coordinate the cooperation between the parties and the court to realize effective defense in the specific procedure of excluding illegal evidence.
关 键 词:严格排除非法证据规则 有效辩护理念 辩护律师
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33