检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐丹 姚淳[2] 顾敏[1] XU Dan;YAO Chun;GU Min(Department of Stomatology,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,The First People's Hospital of Changzhou City.Changzhou 213003;Department of Stomatology,The People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University,The First People's Hospital of Zhenjiang City,Zhenjiang 212000,Jiangsu Province,China)
机构地区:[1]苏州大学附属第三医院,常州市第一人民医院口腔科,江苏常州213003 [2]江苏大学附属人民医院,镇江市第一人民医院口腔科,江苏镇江212000
出 处:《上海口腔医学》2020年第4期414-417,共4页Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基 金:常州市卫计委青年人才科技项目(QN201708);镇江市卫生局科技创新市重点研发计划(社会发展)(SH2017041)。
摘 要:目的:研究Bio-Oss骨粉+胶原膜(海奥)和骨胶原在位点保存中的临床效果。方法:选取患牙26颗,随机分为2组。骨粉组13例,于拔牙窝内植入Bio-Oss骨粉,表面覆盖胶原膜(海奥);骨胶原组13例,于拔牙窝内仅植入BioOss骨胶原。3个月后复查,观察2组患牙牙槽窝愈合情况,于位点保存术后即刻和术后3个月进行锥形束CT(CBCT)检查,测量牙槽骨垂直向高度与水平颊舌向厚度、CBCT灰度值的变化,临床观察新骨外形轮廓的改变,评价位点保存的临床效果。采用SPSS 17.0软件包对数据进行处理。结果:2组在新骨外形轮廓方面无显著差异(P>0.05);术后3个月,2组牙槽骨高度、厚度均减低,灰度值升高,均有统计学差异(P均<0.01),但2组疗效无显著差异(P均>0.05)。结论:2种材料用于位点保存时效果无显著差异,但使用骨胶原的位点保存技术操作简单,创伤小,费用低。PURPOSE:To investigate the effect of Bio-Oss bone powder combined with Heal-All Oral repair membrane and Bio-Oss collagen on site preservation during implantology.METHODS:A total of 26 cases were randomly divided into 2 groups.In Bio-Oss bone powder group(13 cases),the sockets were filled with Bio-Oss bone powder,covering with Heal-All Oral repair membrane on the surface.In Bio-Oss collagen group(13 cases),the sockets were filled with Bio-Oss collagen only.The changes in alveolar bone density,height,width and new bone contour were evaluated with cone-beam CT(CBCT)after site preservation.The data were analyzed with SPSS 17.0 software package.RESULTS:There was no significant difference in new bone contour between 2 groups(P>0.05).The changes in height,width and grey level of alveolar bone between the two groups were significantly different after 3 months of follow-up(P<0.01),but the curative effect was similar(P>0.05).CONCLUSIONS:There is no significant difference in the efficacy of site preservation between the two materials.However,the site preservation technique using collagen is simple,less invasive and less costly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7