检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢艳萍 陈斌 马玲 杨如煜 LU Yan-ping;CHEN Bin;MA Ling;YANG Ru-yu(Department of Stomatology,Nankai District Wangdingdi Hospital of Tianjin,Tianjin 300191,China)
机构地区:[1]天津市南开区王顶堤医院口腔科,天津300191
出 处:《中国城乡企业卫生》2020年第8期172-174,共3页Chinese Journal of Urban and Rural Enterprise Hygiene
摘 要:目的探讨正畸治疗中应用粘接式颊面管与带环颊面管对牙周健康影响。方法本研究选择2016年1月-2018年12月于天津市南开区王顶堤医院治疗结束的正畸患者50例共200颗牙作为研究对象,根据正畸方式分为粘接式颊面管组27例108颗牙与带环颊面管组23例92颗牙,比较两组的牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PLI)和牙周探诊深度(PPD),以评价患者的牙周健康情况。结果粘接式颊面管组的GI、PLI高于带环颊面管组,PPD异常率低于带环颊面管组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论粘接式颊面管在维护牙周健康方面优于带环颊面管,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the periodontal health influence of using bonding type and ring band type buccal tube in orthodontic treatment.Methods In this study,50 orthodontic patients with a total of 200 teeth who were treated in Nankai District Wangdingdi Hospital of Tianjin from January 2016 to December 2018 were selected as the research objects.According to the orthodontic methods,they were divided into two groups:bonding type buccal tube group(27 cases,108 teeth)and ring band type buccal tube group(23 cases,92 teeth).The gingival index(GI),plaque index(PLI)and periodontal probing depth(PPD)of the two groups were compared to evaluate the periodontal health of the patients.Results The GI and PLI of bonding type buccal tube group were higher than those of ring band type buccal tube group,and the abnormal rate of PPD was lower than that of ring band type buccal tube group,and the differences above all were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Bonding type buccal tube was superior to ring band type buccal tube in maintaining periodontal health,which was worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.242.110