检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟星晨 Zhai Xingchen(People's Procuratorate of Changzhou District,Wuzhou Guangxi 543002)
机构地区:[1]梧州市长洲区人民检察院,广西梧州543002
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2020年第4期50-53,共4页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:退回补充侦查作为我国刑事诉讼环节中的一项重要制度,其正确适用对于准确查明案件事实、保障案件办理质量、防止冤假错案等发挥着重要的作用。在当前的司法实践中,公诉环节退回补充侦查还存在着退补比例过高、退补提纲制作不够规范、侦查机关补充侦查的积极性不高、存在利用退回补充侦查延长办案期限等问题,在一定程度上降低了诉讼效率和质量,也损害了犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益。梳理退回补充侦查制度,针对公诉环节退回补充侦查存在的问题,提出相应的解决对策,有助于更好的适应当前“以审判为中心”的刑事诉讼制度改革的要求,进一步提高诉讼质量。Returning supplementary investigation is an important system in China’s criminal procedure.Its correct application plays an important role in accurately ascertaining the facts of the case,ensuring the quality of the case,and preventing wrongful conviction.In the current judicial practice of supplementary investigations,there are some problems such as a high proportion of refunds,the lack of standardization of the supplementary supplements,the lack of enthusiasm for the investigation agencies,and extending the time limit with the use of the return of supplementary investigations.To a certain extent,it reduces the efficiency and quality of litigation,and also damages the legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects.Sorting out the system of returning supplementary investigations,and proposing corresponding solutions to the existing problems,which will help to better adapt to the requirements of the current“trial-oriented”reform of the criminal procedure system and further improve the quality of litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49