检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:霍丽丽 HUO Li-li(School of Law,Anhui University,Heifei Anhui 230601)
出 处:《巢湖学院学报》2020年第4期34-40,共7页Journal of Chaohu University
摘 要:家事纠纷的妥善解决关乎社会的和谐稳定和司法文明的进步,但我国目前尚没有专门性家事司法解决机制,家事纠纷的司法解决机制仍处于传统审判体制和调解机制的混合适用状态。社会环境的变化和家庭结构的重建使得法院面临的家事纠纷复杂且数量庞大,考察先进家事司法国家的家事纠纷解决机制建设经验,启示我们:我国亟需推进家事专项立法,构建专门家事解决机制;深化案件类型化区分;确立司法调解机制;改革传统审判机制;能动利用社会资源,构建家事司法社会化机制,多元渠道解决家事纠纷。The proper settlement of family disputes is related to the harmony and stability of society and the progress of judicial civilization.However,there is no specialized judicial settlement mechanism for family disputes in China at present,and the judicial settlement mechanism for family disputes is still in the mixed application state of traditional trial system and mediation mechanism.With the change of social environment and the reconstruction of family structure,the family disputes faced by courts are complex and numerous.Investigating the experience of building a family dispute resolution mechanism in countries with advanced family justice reveals that:China urgently needs to promote special legislation on family affairs and build a special family dispute resolution mechanism,deepen the classification of cases,establish judicial mediation mechanism,reform the traditional trial mechanism and actively use social resources to construct family justice socialization mechanism and settle family disputes in multi-channels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.207.132