贾谊与贾谊集的文学史观察  

Comment on the Literature History of Jia Yi and Jia Yi’s Collected Works

作　　者：刘明 Liu Ming(Institute of Literature,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Institute of Literature,Beijing,100732)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院文学研究所图书室,北京100732

出　　处：《语文学刊》2020年第4期96-100,共5页Journal of Language and Literature Studies

摘　　要：刘勰《文心雕龙·诠赋》准确而精当地界定了贾谊的文学史地位,认为他的赋作继承了秦代的杂赋文学传统。结合贾谊创作的两篇赋作《吊屈原赋》和《鵩鸟赋》,以说理为主旨,句式表达也与荀卿《赋篇》及李斯刻石文辞一脉相承,体现出主流的秦代文学传统。同时也受到了楚辞体创作的影响,主要是增加了舒缓语气的"兮"字,表明汉初的赋体创作沿着两种文学传统在融合演进。贾谊集的编定,是固守别集本位和扩大"文集"范围这样两种理路的反映,意味着不仅要在纯文学范畴内观察贾谊的文学史,还要在杂文学的视野里注重《新书》的政论类作品。Jia Yi’s literature history status is accurately and precisely defined in Wen Xin Diao Long·Quan Fu written by Liu Xie,which is believed that the Fu(赋)works inherit the literary tradition of the Qin Dynasty.This opinion isn’t quoted in several existing works of Chinese literature history and has not been taken seriously by literary historians.Combination through the two Fu(赋)works:"Diao Qu Yuan Fu"and"Fu Niao Fu",appearing as the expository literature theme,and the sentence expression reflecting the influence of"Fu Pian"written by XunZi and sharpening language written by Li Si,it reflects the mainstream of the Qin literary tradition.At the same time,it’s also influenced by the creation of Chu Ci in the south,added the soothing word"Xi"(兮),which indicates that Fu(赋)writing evolved along the fusion of the two literary traditions in the early Han Dynasty.The compilation of Jia Yi’s collected works,reflects the two ways:taking the individual collection of works as the standard and expanding the scope of"collected works",which means that not only Comment on the literature history of Jia Yi within the context of pure literature,but also pay attention to the works collected in Xin Shu in the view of mixed literature.

关 键 词：贾谊贾谊集 秦代文学传统 楚辞体 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]