共通与殊异——马克思与怀特海的共同体思想之比较  

Commonality and Differences: Comparison on the Community Thoughts of Marx and Whitehead

作　　者：张秀华[1] 翟羽佳[1,2] 王玉[1] ZHANG Xiu-hua;ZHAI Yu-jia;WANG Yu(School of Marxism,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088;Library,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学马克思主义学院,北京100088 [2]中国政法大学图书馆,北京100088

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2020年第8期80-86,共7页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：北京市社会科学基金重大项目“马克思与怀特海思想的共通性研究”(18ZDA11);北京高校中国特色社会主义理论研究协同创新中心(中国政法大学)、北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心中国政法大学基地的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：马克思与怀特海立足现实世界分别构建了体现唯物史观的"社会共同体"和关照自然存在的"宇宙共同体"。二者共同体思想都是总体性辩证法、过程-关系思维和机体理论的表达,在新主体性原则下彰显了寻求和谐共生、生态正义等价值向度。同时依循各自的哲学观和理论旨趣,围绕实现"真正共同体""平和的共同体"文明目标,他们的共同体范畴在构成要素、终极形态、实现路径上又存在不可忽视的诸多差异。对上述两种共同体思想的共通性与殊异性的比较研究,有助于促进马克思和怀特海哲学的深层对话,也必将为探讨"两个共同体"思想提供可资借鉴的理论资源。Based on the real world,Marx and Whitehead constructed the"social community"embodying the historical materialism and the"universal community"concerning the natural existence.Both of them are the expression of holistic dialectics,process relationship thinking and organism theory.Under the principle of new subjectivity,they show the value of seeking harmonious coexistence and ecological justice.According to their own philosophy and theoretical purport,around the realization of"real community"and"peaceful community"civilization goal,their community category has many differences in the constituent elements,ultimate form and realization path that cannot be ignored.The comparative study of the two kinds of community thoughts will help to promote the deep dialogue between Marx’s and Whitehead’s philosophy,and will also provide theoretical resources for the discussion of"two communities".

关 键 词：马克思 怀特海 共同体 总体性辩证法 宇宙论 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]