论五输穴向心排列与《灵枢·经脉》中经脉循行方向相悖  

On Conflict between Centripetal Arrangement of Five-Shu Points and Circular Arrangement of Meridians Recorded in Lingshu(Miraculous Pivot)

作　　者：曹昺焱[1] 饶毅 肖京[1] 陈卓 CAO Bingyan;RAO Yi;XIAO Jing;CHEN Zhuo(Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100091, China)

机构地区：[1]中国中医科学院西苑医院,北京100091

出　　处：《针灸临床杂志》2020年第8期1-4,共4页Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年项目,编号:81703928,81704192。

摘　　要：本研究探讨了五输穴按向心方向排列走行和《灵枢·经脉》所载的十二经脉按半向心、半离心方向走向之间的悖论。首先论述了古代医家对此的解释,并在此基础上提出:目前针对经脉全向心循行和半向心、半离心循行之间的悖论尚不存在一种完美的解释。因为两种经络循行体系各有独特的临床指导价值。两种循行体系都是传统中医思想的有效传承媒介,不宜整合兼并。针灸从业者应同时学习两种体系,以对传统针灸理论有更深入的认识。The article discussed the conflict between the centripetal arrangement of five-shu points and the half centripetal and half centrifugal processing of meridians.By summarizing the explanation from ancient traditional Chinese medical scientists,it pointed out that there was no perfect explanation on the conflict.Since the theories of centripetal processing of meridians and half centripetal,and half centrifugal processing of meridians had their own guiding value on clinical issues.The theories are propagation media of traditional Chinese medicine viewpoints,therefore they can not be integrated into one theory,therefore acupuncture practitioner should learn the theories in order to have a deep insight into traditional acupuncture theory.

关 键 词：五输穴 向心排列 经脉循行 

分 类 号：R224.2[医药卫生—中医基础理论]