检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄知伟 刘颖 HUANG Zhi-wei;LIU Ying(College of Marxism,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300070,China)
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学马克思主义学院,天津300070
出 处:《医学与哲学》2020年第18期36-39,共4页Medicine and Philosophy
基 金:2017年教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(17YJC710085);2019年天津医科大学教育教学研究项目(2019YY076)。
摘 要:20世纪中后期,病人自主权的确立使得医疗行为中主体权责划分日渐清晰,医疗决策的过程逐渐规范化。然而在医疗实践中,人们也意识到病人自主不是绝对的、无条件的原则,并开始探讨何种情况下可以对病人自主进行限制。从对病人主体形象的重构中指出个人利益与公共利益在价值层面的一致性,强调在公共卫生事件的处理中医生决策权的必要性。在医疗社会化和全球化的背景下,公共卫生危机的化解、公民道德共识的达成,有赖于病人、医生、社会及国家间的共同努力。In the mid-to-late 20th century,the establishment of patient autonomy made the division of authority and responsibility in medical practices increasingly clear,the process of medical decision-making was gradually standardized.However,in medical practice,people also realized that patient autonomy was not an absolute and unconditional principle,and began to explore under what circumstances patient autonomy could be restricted.This article points out the consistency of personal interest and public interest from the reconstruction of the patient's subject image,emphasizes the need for doctors'decision-making in the handling of public health events.In the context of medical socialization and globalization,the resolution of the public health crisis and the achievement of civic moral consensus depend on the joint efforts of patients,doctors,society and the country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90