具体行政行为和抽象行政行为的交叉地带及其法律思考  

The Cross Zone and Legal Thinking between the Specific Administrative Action and Abstract Administrative Action

作　　者：卢航 杨峥嵘 LU Hang;YANG Zheng-rong(Law School, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, China;School of Law and Public Administration, Hunan University of Technology and Commerce, Changsha 410205, China)

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410006 [2]湖南工商大学法学与公共管理学院,湖南长沙410205

出　　处：《河北科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第3期65-71,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology:Social Sciences

摘　　要：中国法学理论和立法对具体行政行为和抽象行政行为的界定较为明确,但实践中两者之间存在着交叉地带,包括文件的同一内容针对特定对象和不特定对象分别构成具体行政行为和抽象行政行为、同一文件的不同内容分别构成具体行政行为和抽象行政行为等复杂情形。法学理论和立法对这一地带均未深入研究,导致出现了两者界定难的问题。这一问题不能采用某些学者“取消两种行政行为划分”的办法来消除,而应通过出台全国统一适用的、操作性强的规范性文件管理方面的立法,细化和补充相关司法解释的规定,以及严格执行两种行政行为的相关监管制度等途径来解决。The difference between the specific administrative action and abstract administrative action is clearly defined in Chinese legal theory and legislation.But in practice,there is a"cross zone"between both sides:the same content of the document constitutes different administrative acts in the light of specific objects and non specific objects respectively,different contents of the same document constitute different administrative acts,and so on.There is few in-depth study in this area in law theory and legislation,which leads to the difficulty of defining them.This problem can not be solved by"abolishing the division of the two administrative acts".Instead,it should be solved by enacting the national unified and applicable legislation on the standardized document management with high operability,specifying and supplementing the relevant provisions of judicial interpretations,and strictly enforcing the relevant supervision regime of the two administrative acts.

关 键 词：具体行政行为 抽象行政行为 交叉地带 法律思考 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]