互联网司法中法院调查取证权制度的重构研究  

Research on the Reconstruction of the Court's Right to Investigate and Collect Evidence in Internet Justice

作　　者：刘佳玮 LIU Jia-wei(Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,China,310008)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《广东开放大学学报》2020年第4期42-47,共6页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY

摘　　要：随着互联网的深入发展,全国纷纷设立或建立互联网法院、审判庭以应对日益增多的互联网司法案件,电子证据作为新的证据形式被广泛使用。但在当前的互联网司法中,存在举证责任分配不合理、电子证据真实性难以认证、法律法规杂乱、电子取证规则匮乏等问题。从诉讼目的、法院角色和司法实践来看,对互联网司法中法院的调查取证权进行重构显得十分必要。在重构过程中,首先应当确定“以法院调查取证为主,当事人提供证据为辅”的举证责任分配模式。其次相应的设立预审法官制度,让预审法官具体行使调查取证权,尝试探索委托调查取证的新模式。同时运用区块链技术搭建全国性的电子数据平台,统一取证和认证标准。With the further developments of the Internet,Internet courts and tribunals have been set up across the country to deal with the increasing number of Internet judicial cases.Electronic evidence is widely used as a new form of evidence,but there are some problems in the practice,such as the burden of proof is unfairly distributed,the authenticity of electronic evidence is difficult to verify,disordered laws and regulations,and lack of electronic evidence rules,etc.From the perspectives of litigation purpose,court role and judicial practice,it is necessary to reconstruct the power of investigation and evidence collection of the court in Internet justice.First of all,we should determine the distribution mode of burden of proof,which should rely on the court to investigate and collect evidence,supplemented by evidence provided by parties.Secondly,the system of pre-trial judge should be established to allow the pre-trial judge exercise the power of investigation and evidence collection as a new mode of commissioned investigation and evidence collection.Meanwhile,the block chain technology is to be used to build a national electronic data platform to unify the forensics and certification standards.

关 键 词：互联网司法 调查取证 举证责任 区块链 法院 

分 类 号：D925.113[政治法律—诉讼法学]