检察主导抑或审判中心:认罪认罚从宽制度中的权力冲突与交融  

Prosecutorial Lead or Trial Center:the Power Conflict and Blending in the System of Leniency on Admission of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment

作　　者：闵丰锦[1,2] MIN Fengjin(School of Southwest University of Political Science and Law;Department of the People's Procuratorate of Nanan District of Chongqing)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院 [2]重庆市南岸区人民检察院检察二部

出　　处：《法学家》2020年第5期148-162,195,共16页The Jurist

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“看守所法立法研究”(18BFX078)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：以量刑建议“一般应当采纳”的新刑诉法规定为标志,认罪认罚从宽制度中的控审权力产生了一定的结构性冲突,直接体现在量刑建议采纳率的“断崖式”下降。检察院抗诉法院未采纳认罪认罚量刑建议的有关数据显示,控审双方对认罪认罚案件量刑建议的程序及内容存在分歧。为了充分尊重控辩双方“合作”后达成的协商合意,认罪认罚从宽制度运行中的法检权力此消彼长,产生了“求刑权与量刑权”“实体性权力与程序性权力”“检察主导作用与以审判为中心”的三维冲突。控审双方应当在彼此尊重的基础之上,加强认罪认罚案件定罪量刑的双向沟通,以达到检察主导与审判中心的交融调和。During the operation of the system of leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment,the prosecutorial lead conflicts with trial center,especially when the sentencing proposal must be accepted generally according to the criminal procedure law. Based on the data of the prosecutorial plea of the cases that the sentencing proposals are denied by the court in the system of leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment,there exist the conflicts between the content and procedure of sentencing proposal power and sentencing power. Seemingly,the conflicts result in the expansion of prosecutorial sentencing proposal power and reduction of judicial sentencing power,but practically,the inner cause is the impact of prosecutorial lead to trial center. In order to resolve the conflict,the prosecutorial organ and judicial organ must start with mutual respect and enhance the mutual communication of conviction and sentencing in the system of leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment,so that the prosecutorial lead and trial center can be effectively blended.

关 键 词：检察主导 审判中心 权力冲突 量刑建议 认罪认罚从宽 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]