检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李子禹[1] 吴舟桥[1] 陕飞[1] 季加孚[1] Li Ziyu;Wu Zhouqiao;Shan Fei;Ji Jiafu(The First Ward of Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research(Minis-try of Education),Peking University Cancer Hospital&Institute,Beijing 100142,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所胃肠肿瘤中心外科一病区,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,100142
出 处:《中华消化外科杂志》2020年第9期941-945,共5页Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
基 金:北京市科技计划课题(D141100000414004,D141100000414002);白求恩基金会卓越外科基金。
摘 要:腹腔镜全胃切除术消化道重建一直是胃外科关注的热点与难点。腹腔镜手术中应用直线切割吻合器、圆形吻合器、手工缝合等不同方式完成消化道重建的临床技术特点及其优缺点,已形成业内共识。但是,针对不同消化道重建方式的安全性评估,目前仍然缺乏足够的临床证据。笔者结合目前的临床研究进展及其医疗中心的临床实践,总结并探讨腹腔镜全胃切除术后常用消化道重建方式的安全性评估现状及方法。The digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic total gastrectomy has always been a hotspot but a difficult subject as well in gastric cancer surgery.The clinical technical characteristics and advantages of different digestive tract reconstruction methods by using linear stapler,circular stapler or hand-sewn anastomosis in laparoscopic surgery have formed consensuses.However,there is still insufficient clinical evidence for the safety evaluation of different digestive tract reconstruction methods.Combined with current clinical research progress and their clinical practice,the authors summarize and investigate the status and methods of safety evaluation of common digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic total gastrectomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38