检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱永彪[1,2,3] 苗肖阳 Zhu Yongbiao;Miao Xiaoyang
机构地区:[1]兰州大学政治与国际关系学院 [2]兰州大学“一带一路”研究中心 [3]阿富汗研究中心
出 处:《南亚研究》2020年第3期92-107,158,159,共18页South Asian Studies
基 金:2019年兰州大学“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助”(项目编号:2019JBKY JD018)的阶段性成果,同时受到2019年教育部国别和区域研究课题支持。
摘 要:当前中南亚地区呈现出多种安全合作机制共存的局面。一方面各种安全合作机制越来越朝着多元化、专业化的方向发展;另一方面诸多安全合作机制的边界逐渐模糊,呈现出重叠、竞争、无序的趋势,出现了安全合作机制复杂化、混乱化的现象。基于跨文化传播理论的分析发现,存在多种安全文化与安全观且对安全合作机制有重要影响、文化共性的缺失与跨文化传播受阻、安全文化价值取向存在偏差、文化间性问题被忽略等,是造成中南亚地区安全合作机制复杂化、混乱化的主要原因,降低了地区安全合作的制度化水平,加剧了安全合作机制的复杂性,对中南亚地区安全治理构成了严峻的挑战。Many different mechanisms for security cooperation exist across South and Central Asia,and on one level these institutions are developing in the direction of becoming more dynamic and specialized.On another level,the boundaries between various security cooperation mechanisms has been blurred,such that there is overlap,competition,or even chaotic interactions between them,resulting in an increasingly complex landscape when it comes to security cooperation.Applying crosscultural communications theories to the study of this phenomenon,we find that the coexistence of different forms of security cultures and security perspectives has profound impact on mechanisms for security cooperation.The lack of common cultural characteristics and barriers in crosscultural communications,differences in values with respect to strategic culture,and a lack of awareness between cultures are all factors contributing to the complexity and chaotic nature of South and Central Asian security cooperation.These factors further result in lower levels of institutionalization of security cooperation,thereby further adding to the complexity of the security landscape,and presenting grave challenges for South and Central Asian security governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33