检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐泽东 陶建国[1] TANG Ze-dong;TAO Jian-guo(School of Law, Hebei University, Baoding Hebei 071002, China)
出 处:《华北理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第5期11-16,共6页Journal of North China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:探望权判决是对当事人及其未成年子女的未来生活作出安排的一种判决,子女利益最大化是法官遵循的首要原则。目前,我国存在着判决主文对探望权行使方法的确定缺乏详细规定的现象,其后果是容易引发判决履行方面的争议,即使进入强制执行程序,由于缺乏具体的执行标准,法院也将难以执行。为了减少当事人之间的争议,法官应当充分认识探望权判决具体化的重要性,了解对判决具体化有重要影响的相关因素。另一方面,有必要建构相关纠纷处理制度,快速处理因判决内容具体化不足引发的争议。The judgment of the right of visitation is a judgment to make arrangement for the future life of the parties and their minor children.The maximization of children’s interests is the first principle followed by judges.At present,there is a lack of clarity in the determination of the method to exercise the right of visitation in the main content of the judgment.As a result,it is easy to cause disputes on the performance of the judgement.It is difficult for the courts to enforce it,even entering the enforcement process.In order to reduce disputes between the parties,the judge should fully understand the importance of confirmation of the judgment and the relevant factors that have an importance on the confirmation of the judgment.On the other hand,it is necessary to establish a relevant dispute settlement system to quickly deal with disputes caused by the inadequacy of the content of the judgment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7