没有心灵就没有意义——反心理主义错在何处  

No Heart, No Meaning——What is wrong with anti-psychologism

作　　者：朱志方[1] Zhu Zhifang(School of Philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学哲学学院,武汉430071

出　　处：《学术交流》2020年第7期23-29,191,共8页Academic Exchange

摘　　要：弗雷格的反心理主义设定了第三领域,他的第三领域的概念不仅在本体论和认识论上是神秘的,而且导致多个内在矛盾。普特南宣称意义不在头脑中,但并没有提供真正坚实的论证,他将这个结论事先预置在他所虚构的同形地球的场境中了。皮尔士的行动主义的语义学不仅容纳了关于解释与理解的心理事实,并且通过行动来保证意义的清晰性。Frege’s anti-psychologism sets up the third field, which is not only mysterious in ontology and epistemology, but also leads to many internal contradictions. Putnam claims that meaning is not in the mind, but does not provide a real solid argument. He presupposes this conclusion in the field of his imaginary homomorphic earth. Peirce’s semantics of activism contains the psychological facts about interpretation and understanding, as well as ensures the clarity of meaning through action.

关 键 词：意义 反心理主义 皮尔士 解释 

分 类 号：B812[哲学宗教—逻辑学]