卢卡奇的马克思经济哲学研究及其悲剧性结局(上)  

Lukács’ Economic Philosophical Thought in the Context of Marx’s Economic Philosophy and Its Tragic Ending(Ⅰ)

作　　者：宫敬才[1] Gong Jingcai

机构地区：[1]河北大学哲学与社会学学院

出　　处：《马克思主义与现实》2020年第5期103-111,204,共10页Marxism & Reality

摘　　要：围绕《历史与阶级意识》对卢卡奇哲学思想的争论已有近百年历史,总体上看,忽略其经济哲学性质是普遍存在的现象,其后果是卢卡奇哲学思想的根本特质和真实历史地位无法被揭示出来。在马克思经济哲学语境中检视卢卡奇哲学思想,具体内容和评价性结论就会发生质变,划时代意义的经济哲学思想将出现在我们面前。卢卡奇在与第二国际和第三国际马克思主义的比较视域中提出并回答何谓正统马克思主义的问题,历史与现实、理论与实践、特别是主体与客体辩证统一的马克思经济哲学方法论特质被揭示出来。卢卡奇大力批判资产阶级经济学和第二国际马克思主义的经济事实观,用马克思辩证总体的经济事实观与之相抗衡并发展出自己的经济事实观,为物化理论的提出和确立准备了方法论前提。The debate about Lukács’ philosophical thought around History and Class Consciousness has been going on for nearly a hundred years. On the whole,it is a common phenomenon to ignore the nature of his economic philosophy,the consequence of which is that the fundamental character and true historical status of Lukács’ philosophical thought cannot be revealed. A review of Lukács’ philosophical thought in the context of Marx’s economic philosophy will result in a qualitative change in the concrete content and evaluation conclusion,and bring to us an epoch-making economic philosophy thought. Lukács raised and answered the question of what orthodox Marxism is in the comparative view of Second and Third International Marxism. Lukács’ severe criticism of the view of economic facts of bourgeois economics and Second International Marxism,his use of Marx’s dialectical view of economic facts to counter it and his development of his own view of economic facts provided the methodological premise for the theory of materialization.

关 键 词：卢卡奇 马克思经济哲学 哲学分析框架 经济事实观 

分 类 号：F091.3[经济管理—政治经济学] B515[哲学宗教—外国哲学]