蜀汉政局与巴蜀经学的演变  

The Political Situation of Shuhan Kingdom and the Evolution of Bashu Confucian Classics

作　　者：潘忠伟[1] PAN Zhong-wei(Institute of Philosophy,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu 610068,China)

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学哲学研究所,四川成都610068

出　　处：《西华师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第5期10-15,共6页Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences

摘　　要：从全局看,蜀汉经学演进的基本路径取决于蜀汉执政者的用人格局。考察刘备、诸葛亮用人方略的不同,可以明了蜀汉政局与巴蜀经学格局之间存在直接的相互映衬关系,巴蜀经学也可依照执政者的用人偏好不同而细分为三期:第一期即刘备时期,其时蜀汉官方试图以卢植、郑玄为典型的经学体系整齐巴蜀学术,但随着刘备的谢世而宣告失败;第二期即诸葛亮主政时期,官方立场极度倾向于荆州学派的巴蜀学者,荆州学派深刻地改变了巴蜀经学的面貌,而使得古文经学派在巴蜀经学中占有主导地位。第三期即诸葛亮谢世之后的蜀汉末期,兼受荆州学派和巴蜀谶纬神学影响的谯周学派,最终成为蜀汉经学的集大成者。From the overall point of view,the basic path of the evolution of Shuhan(or Bashu)Confucian classics depends on the rulers' pattern of choosing and employing persons.Through the investigation of Liu Bei and Zhuge Liang's different employment strategies,the author finds that there is a direct relationship between the political situation of Shuhan kingdom and the patterns of Bashu Confucian classics.The history of Shuhan Confucian classics can also be divided into three periods according to the rulers' different preferences for choosing and employing persons.The first one is Liu Bei's period in which the officials of Shuhan kingdom tried to take Lu Zhi and Zheng Xuan as the typical Confucian classics system for the uniformity of Bashu academic.However,it failed after Liu Bei passed away.The second one is Zhuge Liang's reign period in which the official attitude is extremely inclined to Bashu scholars of the Jingzhou school.The Jingzhou school profoundly changed the appearance of Bashu Confucian classics,and made the school of ancient Classics play a leading role in Bashu Confucian classics.The third one is the late Shuhan kingdom after Zhuge Liang's death.Influenced by the Jingzhou school and divination tradition of Bashu,the school of Qiao Zhou finally became the master of Shuhan Confucian classics.

关 键 词：蜀汉 郑玄 荆州学派 谯周 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]