第三人到期债权执行名义的正当性刍议  

On Entity Relief for the Execution of Third Party’s Due Claims

作　　者：姜艳 Jiang Yan(Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《河北科技师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2020年第3期73-77,共5页Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：西南政法大学2020年度学生科研创新项目“第三人到期债权执行实体救济之类型化分析”(FXY2020106)。

摘　　要：执行第三人到期债权时,债权难以公示,执行机构又因审执分离原则不能对到期债权进行实体判断,易出现与真实权利悖离的情况,加之执行程序侧重对债权人的权益保护,过分追求执行效率,执行名义的正当性受到质疑,会有不当执行行为发生的可能性。因现行规定未涉及对第三人的实体救济,而对债权人的救济又不能实现预期保护债权人利益的作用,故根据权利主体的不同赋予相应的救济途径,以期能完善现有的救济体系,方能兼顾公平与效率。When executing the third party’s due creditor’s rights,the creditor’s rights are difficult to be publicized,and the executing agency can not make a substantive judgment on the due creditor’s rights because of the principle of separation of trial and execution.Because the existing provisions do not involve the entity relief to the third party,and the relief of creditor can not realize the expected role of protecting the interests of the creditor,corresponding relief methods shall be given to different rights subjects,so as to improve the existing relief system,and attach equal importance to fairness and efficiency.

关 键 词：第三人到期债权 执行救济 收取诉讼 债务人异议之诉 不当得利之诉 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]