中文版颌面部疼痛和失能问卷在颞下颌关节疾病患者中的应用及信效度检验  

Application of the Chinese version of Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory in patients with temporomandibular joint disease and its reliability and validity test

作　　者：莫雪芳[1] 路海云[2] 钱绮华[1] Mo Xuefang;Lu Haiyun;Qian Qihua(Department of Stomatology,the Second People's Hospital of Foshan,Foshan 528000,China;Department of Nursing,the Second People's Hospital of Foshan,Foshan 528000,China)

机构地区：[1]佛山市第二人民医院口腔科,528000 [2]佛山市第二人民医院护理部,528000

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2020年第29期4057-4060,共4页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的对颌面部疼痛与失能问卷(CF-PDI)进行翻译汉化,并检验其在颞下颌关节疾病患者中的信效度。方法将西班牙语版的CF-PDI翻译成中文并修订。采用便利抽样法,选取2019年1-12月在佛山市第二人民医院住院治疗的250例颞下颌关节疾病患者为研究对象,使用中文版CF-PDI对其进行调查并检验问卷的信效度。结果本研究共发放250份调查问卷,回收231份有效问卷,有效回收率为92.4%。中文版CF-PDI保留原版问卷的21个条目,问卷的总内容效度为0.917;通过探索性因子分析和主成分分析法,共可提取2个特征根植≥1的公因子,累积方差贡献率为67.4%,各条目所在因子的载荷度为0.486~0.744,2个因子之间的Pearson相关系数为0.476,因子1、2与总问卷的Pearson相关系数为0.785和0.814,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01);中文版CF-PDI与疼痛数字评定量表的相关系数为0.496~0.532,与疼痛灾难化量表总分及各维度得分的相关性系数为0.246~0.476,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01);中文版CF-PDI的Cronbach'sα系数为0.843,重测信度为0.812。结论中文版CF-PDI具有良好的信效度,适用于颞下颌关节疾病患者的疼痛影响和功能评估。Objective To translated and Chinesize Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory(CF-PDI)and test its reliability and validity in patients with temporomandibular joint disease.Methods The Spanish version of CF-PDI was translated into Chinese and revised.Using the convenient sampling method,a total of 250 patients with temporomandibular joint disease who were hospitalized in the Second People's Hospital of Foshan from January to December 2019 were selected as research objects.The Chinese version of CF-PDI was used to investigate and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were verified.Results In this study,a total of 250 questionnaires were issued and 231 valid questionnaires were collected,with an effective recovery rate of 92.4%.The Chinese version of CF-PDI retained 21 items of the original questionnaire,and the total content validity of the questionnaire was 0.917.Through exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis,a total of 2 common factors with characteristic roots over or equal to1 can be extracted,the cumulative variance contribution rate was 67.4%,and the loading degree of the factor of each item was 0.486 to 0.744.The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two factors was 0.476,and the Pearson correlation coefficient between factors 1 and 2 and the total questionnaire were 0.785 and 0.814.The differences were statistically significant(P<0.01).The correlation coefficient between The Chinese version of CF-PDI and the Pain Digital Rating Scale was 0.496 to 0.532,and he correlation coefficient between The Chinese version of CF-PDI and the total score and scores of each dimension of Pain Catastrophizing Scale was 0.246 to 0.476.The differences were statistically significant(P<0.01).Cronbach's coefficient of the Chinese version of CF-PDI was 0.843,and test-retest reliability was 0.812.Conclusions Chinese version of CF-PDI has good reliability and validity,which is suitable for pain effect and functional evaluation for patients with temporomandibular joint disease.

关 键 词：疼痛 颞下颌关节障碍 失能 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R782.6[医药卫生—口腔医学]