检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于亮[1] 叶润仪[1] 单臻[1] 张赟建[1] 陈瑞莞 聂大红[2] 林颖[1] Yu Liang;Ye Runyi;Shan Zhen;Zhang Yunjian;Chen Ruiwan;Nie Dahong;Lin Ying(Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510080,China;Department of Radiation Oncology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510080,China)
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院甲状腺乳腺外科,广州510080 [2]中山大学附属第一医院放射治疗科,广州510080
出 处:《中华普通外科学文献(电子版)》2020年第5期336-340,共5页Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
基 金:中山大学临床医学研究5010计划资助项目(2016007)。
摘 要:目的比较早期乳腺癌保乳术后采用术中光子线对比术后外照射瘤床加量的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析2014年12月至2018年6月中山大学附属第一医院甲状腺乳腺外科收治的222例早期乳腺行保乳手术患者的临床资料,其中72例采用术中光子线瘤床加量(术中放疗组),150例采用术后外照射瘤床加量(术后放疗组)。所有患者术后均行全乳±淋巴引流区外照射放疗,50 Gy/25 Fr。观察术后两组患者的不良反应、美容效果及近期疗效。结果中位随访35个月(11~52个月),术中放疗组比术后放疗组有更低的乳腺纤维化发生率(2.8%vs 13.3%,χ2=6.071,P=0.014),但术后血肿的发生率更高(5.6%vs 0,P=0.015)。术后感染、坏死而引起切口延迟愈合、照射野内中度以上的乳腺疼痛,在两组间差异无统计学意义。术中放疗组和术后放疗组总体不良反应的发生率分别为13.9%和16.0%,美容效果优良率分别为83.3%(60/72)和89.3%(134/150),术后3年的局部复发率分别为0(0/72)和1.3%(2/150),差异均无统计学意义。结论与术后外照射瘤床加量相比较,早期乳腺癌保乳术采用术中光子线的不良反应、美容效果和近期疗效相似。Objective To compare the adverse reaction and cosmetic effect of intraoperative radiotherapy using mobile photon beam with post-operative external radiotherapy as a boost to the tumor bed in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving breast conserving surgery.Methods The clinical data of breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery from December 2014 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively.Patients were divided into intraoperative radiotherapy(72 cases)and postoperative external radiotherapy(150 cases)groups.All patient were treated with radiation therapy to whole breast±regional nodes at the dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions.The adverse reaction and cosmetic effect were followed up as well as postoperative recurrence.Results Median follow-up period was 35 months(11-52 months).Patients developed less breast fibrosis in intraoperative radiotherapy group compared with postoperative external radiotherapy group(2.8%vs 13.3%,χ2=6.071,P=0.014).However,patients developed more postoperative hematoma in intraoperative radiotherapy group compared with post-operative external radiotherapy group(5.6%vs 0,P=0.015).There is no significant difference between the postoperative infection and necrosis resulted in delayed incision healing and moderate or above breast pain in the irradiation field.The overall incidence of adverse reactions was 13.9%and 16.0%respectively,and the difference was not statistically significant.Patients had excellent or good cosmetic outcome was 83.3%in intraoperative radiotherapy group and 89.3%in post-operative external radiotherapy group.The 3-year local recurrentce rate was 0 in intraoperative radiotherapy group and 1.3%in post-operative external radiotherapy group.Conclusion Compared with postoperative external radiotherapy as a boost to the tumor bed,the intraoperative radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery shows acceptable adverse reaction and similar cosmetic outcome as well as short-term efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229