检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:排黑尔丁·凯赛尔 PAI hei er ding·kai sai er(Department of Stomatology,Hetian people's Hospital(Western Hospital District),Xinjiang Hetian 848000,China)
机构地区:[1]和田地区人民医院(西院区)口腔科,新疆和田848000
出 处:《临床医药文献电子杂志》2020年第59期16-16,21,共2页Electronic Journal of Clinical Medical Literature
摘 要:目的比较种植修复及残根保存修复治疗牙齿缺损患者的效果。方法观察组100例采取种植修复方法,对照组100例则采取残根保存修复方法,比较两组修复效果。结果观察组修复效果明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论牙齿缺损患者采取种植修复方法效果明显优于残根保存修复。Objective To compare the effects of implantation repair and residual root preservation in the treatment of tooth defects.Methods In the observation group,100 cases adopted the method of planting and repairing,while in the control group,100 cases adopted the method of residual root preservation and repair,and compared the effect of the two groups.Results The repair effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of implant repair was better than that of residual root preservation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.64