民国时期《谷梁传》研究的特色  

Discussion on the Problems and Methods of Guliang Zhuan in the Republic of China

作　　者：文廷海[1] Wen Tinghai(China West Normal University,Nanchong 637009,China)

机构地区：[1]西华师范大学历史文化学院,四川南充637009

出　　处：《河南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第5期104-109,共6页Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(12BZS001);国家社科基金重大项目(10&ZD058)。

摘　　要：民国时期,杜钢百、蒋元庆、张西堂、李源澄、戴增元等学者围绕《谷梁传》的作者、师承、真伪、义例等问题进行了激烈争论。杜钢百否定宋代学者“谷梁氏”为“姜字切韵脚”的“姜姓假托”说,推定“谷梁”应为“卜商(或孔商)之转音”,《谷梁传》作者为卜商(子夏)。蒋元庆、戴增元不仅否定前说,还否认谷梁氏“受经于子夏”,应是“源出子夏之门人”。张西堂从体例、文辞、义理三个方面,将《谷梁传》与《公羊传》进行比较,认为《谷梁传》非《春秋》真传,否定《谷梁传》传经;李源澄则肯定《谷梁传》解经义例的独特价值。民国学者研究《谷梁传》,强调依靠史料证据解决问题,反对前代学者悬揣、意度及捕风捉影等治学弊端,体现了历史主义特色,具有现代学术典范意义。In the Republic of China,on the basis of the previous scholars,Du Gangbai,Jiang Yuanqing,Zhang Xitang,Li Yuancheng and Dai Zengyuan argued about the author,teacher’s legacy,authenticity and justice involved in Guliang Biography.Du Gangbai denied that the scholars in the Song Dynasty"the Guliang"was"the Jiang",and that"the Guliang"should be"Bushang’s(or Kongshang’s)transliteration",that is,the author of guliang’s Biography is"Bushang(Zixia)".Jiang Yuanqing and Dai Zengyuan not only denied the former theory,but also denied that Guliang should be"the gatekeeper of Zi Xia".Zhang Xitang compared guliangzhuan with Gongyang zhuan from three aspects:style,prose and theory.He thought guliangzhuan was"not the true legend of Spring and Autumn"and denied it.Li Yuancheng affirms the unique value of"righteousness example"in the interpretation of classics in Guliang Zhuan.Visible,scholars of the republic of China established"according to the history books,sentenced to its nature,the proof is correct"academic methods,such as,emphasize on historical evidence to solve the problem,against the former generation of scholars"guess","meaning"and"catch-all"research,embodies the characteristics of historicism and modern academic model significance.

关 键 词：民国学者 《谷梁传》 义例 

分 类 号：K26[历史地理—历史学]