适应风险社会的治理文明:观念、制度与技术  

Governance Civilization Adapted to Risk Society:Idea,System and Technology

作　　者：朱正威[1] 吴佳[1] ZHU Zhengwei;WU Jia

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第10期67-77,共11页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“韧性视角下的城市灾害风险评估与治理研究”(批准号:19AZZ007);中宣部“四个一批”人才项目“新常态背景下的公共政策社会风险评估”(批准号:中宣干字〔2016〕49号)。

摘　　要：新冠肺炎疫情给不同国家和地区的治理体系带来了系统性的冲击。这些冲击超越了财富分配逻辑与传统科层管理思维,并以跨越民主和威权对立的方式赋予政治分野新的内涵。建构适应风险社会的治理文明,需要在风险生产、演化及其防控的意义上重新审视治理体系中的观念、制度与技术。作为现代化的自反性后果,风险的系统效应也推动了公共性的跨边界生长,使得发展与安全相伴相生,以“一体两面”的关系推动着治理理念的演进。在总体安全框架下实现有效制度供给,需要真正建构起迅速回应风险社会治理需求的整体性应急管理体系。面对日新月异的技术进展,如何实现技术理性与政治逻辑的良性互构,是治理体系和治理能力现代化需要高度关注的议题。COVID-19 has brought a systematic impact on the governance system of different countries and regions.These impacts transcend the logic of wealth distribution and the traditional thinking of bureaucratic management.They give new connotations to the political separation in a way that transcends the opposition between democracy and authority.To build a governance civilization that adapts to the risk society,we need to reexamine the idea,system and technology in the governance system in the sense of risk production,evolution and prevention.As a consequence of the reflexivity of modernization,the systematic effect of risk also promotes the cross-border growth of publicity,making development and security coexist,and promoting the evolution of governance idea with the relationship of“one body and two sides”.In order to realize the effective system supply under the overall security framework,we need to really build an integrated emergency management system that can respond to the needs of risk social governance quickly.Facing the rapid development of technology,how to realize the benign mutual construction of technological rationality and political logic is an issue that needs high attention in the modernization of governance system and governance ability.

关 键 词：风险社会 治理理念 制度变迁 技术逻辑 

分 类 号：D63[政治法律—政治学]