检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆兆甜 程亚华[1] 张锋[1] LU Zhaotian;CHENG Yahua;ZHANG Feng(Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China)
出 处:《心理技术与应用》2020年第11期649-662,共14页Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
摘 要:研究通过四个实验系统探讨了人际地位对领导者惩罚动机的影响以及信任在其中所起的中介作用。实验结果发现:(1)与高地位条件相比,低地位条件下的权力感不仅可提高领导者的威慑性惩罚动机,而且可降低其对下属的信任感水平;(2)与低信任条件相比,高信任感可降低领导者对下属的威慑性惩罚动机;(3)与高地位条件相比,低地位条件下的权力感可通过降低领导者对下属的信任感而提高其对下属的威慑性惩罚动机。本研究的构思和实验结论是对Mooijman等人(2015)研究的系统性拓展和深化,不仅有助于加深对威慑性惩罚动机的影响因素及其心理机制的理论理解,而且对于改善组织管理中权力赋予对象的选择机制具有重要的实践指导价值。Through four experiments,we systematically explored the influence of social status on leaders'punishment motives and the mediating role of trust.The main conclusions are as follows:(1)Power with high or low status can not only weaken or improve the leaders'deterrence motives,but also improve or weaken their trust in subordinates.(2)High or low trust can improve or weaken the leaders'deterrence motives of punishing subordinates.(3)Power with high or low status can weaken or improve the leaders'deterrence motives of punishing their subordinates by improving or weakening the leaders'trust in their subordinates.The research conception and experimental conclusion of this study substantially advance the research results of Mooijman et al.(2015),systematicly expanding and deepening the research of Mooijman et al.(2015).This study is conducive to deepening the theoretical understanding of the influence factors of deterrence motives and its psychological mechanism.Moreover,this study has important practical guiding value for improving the selection mechanism of individuals conferred with power in organizational management.
关 键 词:人际地位 信任感 威慑性惩罚动机 罪有应得惩罚动机
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38