检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾浩然 夏保华[1] JIA Hao-ran;XIA Bao-hua(Department of Philosophy&Science,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
出 处:《自然辩证法研究》2020年第9期31-37,共7页Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目(19ZDA040);国家社科基金项目(16BZX025);江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目(KYCX18_0205)。
摘 要:技术哲学在经验转向后面临理论与实践的困境。对此,克洛斯和梅耶斯提出技术哲学的价值论转向。价值论转向具体分为描述性价值论转向和规范性价值论转向。描述性价值论转向在研究目标和进路上与经验转向相一致,可视为经验转向的延续。而采取规范性立场的规范性价值论转向具有颠覆性,并面临休谟问题的挑战。尽管许多技术哲学家赞同并呼吁价值论转向,但这种转向是否可能以及如何实现需要进一步思考。The philosophy of technology is faced with theoretical and practical questions after the empirical turn. Kroes and Meijers proposed that the next step of the philosophy of technology is an axiological turn. The axiological turn can be divided into a descriptive and normative axiological turn. The descriptive axiological turn is consistent with the empirical turn in both the research goal and approach, which can be seen as the continuation of the empirical turn. The normative axiological turn that takes a normative position is radical and faces the challenge of Hume’s problem. Although many philosophers of technology call for the axiological turn, whether this turn is possible and how to realize it requires further consideration.
分 类 号:N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.120.195