检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗先梅 Luo Xianmei
出 处:《文化研究》2020年第1期155-177,共23页Cultural Studies
摘 要:近年来,中国私人美术馆的数量急剧增长,与国家文化政策改革和艺术市场的过度膨胀有着密切联系。上海的几个大型私人美术馆在西岸、浦东的建立和各地对美术馆落户地的争夺,反映了私人美术馆在城市化发展中的作用。从“文化造城”过程中政府职能的转变和有关部门对当代艺术的审查中,可观察到私人美术馆浪潮既是市场经济与政治相互借力的结果,又参与了这两者的博弈。The number of private art museums in China has increased dramatically in recent years,which is closely related to China's cultural policy reform and the excesses of the art market.While different strategies have been played out between the Shanghai government and some private art museums,there are increased competitions between West Bund and Pudong District in the same city,and also among various cities and areas in China.By reviewing the policy reform,comparing the differences and analyzing the reasons behind those competitions,this article combines the perspectives of art history and urban economics to study the role in which private art museums have played.The transformation of governmental functions in the process of enculturated urbanization and the governance power over contemporary art indicate not only the cooperation but also a power balance between the market and politics that reflected by“Urban Museumification”.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229