“儒道先后”与“知圣求贤”——由阮孝绪论中古文士的一种人生选择  

Confucianism or Taoism,Sage or Worthy:Life Choices of Mid-Ancient Literati in Ruan Xiaoxu’s Opinions

作　　者：陈特 Chen Te

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中国语言文学系

出　　处：《上海文化》2020年第10期82-91,127,共11页Shanghai Culture

摘　　要：《梁书·处士传》载录有阮孝绪的一篇《论》,其文涉及儒道评价,文义难解。借助《诗品》研究者对“体二”一词的正确训释,可知阮《论》以儒为“圣”而以道为“贤”,儒先道后。实际上,阮《论》的论说从理论上本于王弼之玄学理论,但王弼对阮孝绪立论的影响更可能是潜移默化的。阮《论》之调和儒道,以儒为先,却又基于玄学理论。阮孝绪之为人也调和儒道但更偏向于道家。结合阮孝绪之论说与其为人,他的行为可说是“知圣求贤”,这种态度,在六朝时期并不鲜见。Ruan Xiaoxu,a famous recluse in the Liang Dynasty,had a treatise on the relation of Confucianism and Taoism,and this treatise was included in The Record of Liang.In this treatise,Ruan proposed the term‘TiEr’(体二),arguing that Confucianism being the Sage and Taoism the Worthy,implicating that Confucianism is more important than Taoism.Moreover,Ruan’s arguments are mainly based on Wang Bi’s metaphysical theory,though unconscious to Ruan.Besides his argument,Ruan Xiaoxu also acted between Confucianism and Daoism.

关 键 词：阮孝绪 体二 多元思想 

分 类 号：B235[哲学宗教—中国哲学]