执行和解制度的反思与建议  

Rethinking the Execution Reconciliation System

作　　者：王晓颖 WANG Xiaoying(Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海201620

出　　处：《中北大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第6期58-62,共5页Journal of North University of China：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：我国现行立法对执行和解制度的法律规制不甚完善,配套制度不甚健全。执行当事人在执行程序中达成的和解协议具有中止执行的效力,兼具私法上契约行为与公法上诉讼行为的属性,"一行为两性质说"更契合其本质属性。在今后立法中,应该明确法院的审查义务与职责、限定协议签订次数与履行期限、赋予债务人提起异议之诉的权利、构建不诚信当事人惩罚机制,以更好地解决"和而不解"的适用困境,实现执行和解制度的立法初衷。The current execution reconciliation system in China is unsound,and lacks adequate auxiliary and supportive systems.Reconciliation agreement can suspend execution,and it has two characteristics:both a contract and a litigation action.To fulfil the objectives of the execution reconciliation system,this paper suggests that the future legislative activities should make clear responsibilities of courts in terms of review processes,delimit the maximum number to sign a reconciliation agreement and the deadline to implement the agreement,grant debtors rights to bring a suit of disagreement,and establish a punishment mechanism for the parties that are dishonest to courts or other parties.

关 键 词：执行和解 中止执行 债务人 异议之诉 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]