人工智能机器人的刑事可罚性  

The Criminal Punishability of Artificial Intelligent Robots

作　　者： 王德政(译) Lasse Quarck;Wang Dezheng

机构地区：[1]基尔大学法学院,德国基尔24118 [2]成都大学法学院,成都610106

出　　处：《中州学刊》2020年第10期48-52,共5页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“刑法目的解释研究”(18YJC820057)。

摘　　要：为了在人工智能的运用中不形成刑法上的规范漏洞,必须在教义学上讨论智能代理的可罚性。无论是出于法律政策还是从刑罚目的理论层面考虑,电子人地位的采用都是有意义和必要的。对实现一般预防目的而言,仅确定可罚性是不够的,还必须向社会大众明确说明已实施的不法行为之可罚性,通过尽可能适当的量刑,对罪责非难进行量化,具体包括进行公益劳动、对机器人的身体进行干预、执行算法所违反规范的内容而进行重新编程、关闭机器人。人工智能的可罚性由此成为可能。In order not to form the normative loopholes in criminal law in the application of artificial intelligence,we must discuss the punishability of intelligent agent in doctrines.Whether it is from the perspective of legal policy or from the perspective of the theory of the purpose of punishment,the adoption of the status of electronic person is meaningful and necessary.In order to achieve the general purpose of prevention,it is not enough to determine the punishability only.It is also necessary to clearly explain to the public the punishability of the illegal acts that have been committed.Through appropriate sentencing as far as possible,we can quantify the blame for the crime,including public welfare labor,intervening in the body of the robot,reprogramming the content of the algorithm that violates the norms and turning off the robot.Therefore,it is possible to punish artificial intelligence..

关 键 词：人工智能 机器人 电子人 算法 可罚性 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]