评中医“实在化”及对中医真理性论证途径的思考  

Commentary on the"Substantiation"of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the Way to Prove the Truth of Traditional Chinese Medicine

作　　者：喻国 YU Guo(Department of Endocrinology,Chengdu Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine&Western Medicine Hospital/Chengdu First People's Hospital,Chengdu 610041,China)

机构地区：[1]成都市中西医结合医院/成都市第一人民医院内分泌科,四川成都610041

出　　处：《医学与哲学》2020年第21期71-74,共4页Medicine and Philosophy

摘　　要：中医的认知基础是现象,科学、西医学的认知基础是物理实在。中医“实在化”是以科学、西医学为标准将中医知识对标或还原为物质结构的研究方法,其违背了中医现象主义的认知基础,通过逻辑演算,该方法得出的现象与物理实在的关系与实际情况相悖,甚至会得出取消中医的结论,其次其有损中医整体论的认知优势。然而,文章也指出中医“实在化”虽不可取,但基于认知基础的不同选择,与中医相关的“实在性”研究并无问题。承接对中医“实在化”的评判,文章最后提出认识论、本体论是中医真理性论证的必由途径。This paper points out that the cognitive basis of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)is phenomenon,while the cognitive basis of science and western medicine is physical reality."Substantiation"of TCM is a research method that takes science and western medicine as the standard to corresponding or reducing TCM knowledge to material structure,which violates the cognitive basis of phenomenism in TCM,through logical calculus,the relationship between the phenomenon and the physical reality obtained by this research method is contrary to the actual situation.It even draws the conclusion that TCM should be abolished.What's more,this research method is detrimental to the cognitive advantage of holism in TCM.However,this paper also points out that"substantiation"of TCM is not desirable,but there is no problem in the research of"reality"related to TCM.Continuing the evaluation of"substantiation"of TCM,the last part of this paper points out that epistemology and ontology are the necessary ways to demonstrate the truth of TCM.

关 键 词：中医 物理实在 还原论 认识论 本体论 

分 类 号：R2-03[医药卫生—中医学]