反事件:迈克尔·索亚的现代叙事阐释及其推演  

Against the Event:Michael Sayeau’s Interpretation and Deduction of Modernist Narrative

作　　者：刘阳[1] Liu Yang(Department of Chinese Literature,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中文系

出　　处：《外国文学研究》2020年第5期135-146,共12页Foreign Literature Studies

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“‘后理论’的文学走向及其新型写作形态研究”(2017BWY002);上海市曙光人才项目“事件论美学的形成机理研究”(16SJ27)。

摘　　要：在对事件思想的前沿研究中,英国叙事学家迈克尔·索亚一反从独特性角度理解事件的惯常做法,以巴迪欧为批判切入口,论证了事件独特性所隐含的原因神秘性及其形而上学症结,醒目地提出“反事件”观点,吸收有关学理,深入阐释了福楼拜等作家如何处理中断与重复的冲突,由此开现代主义叙事先河。其阐释不仅可以在今天得到基于“巧合的日常性”的推演,而且有助于深度澄清一个学术史拐点,即早期现代主义作家在创作中凸显话语自身构造,何以与索绪尔从理论上确立语言论起点这一事实发生于同时期。In the frontier research on event,English narratologist Michael Sayeau took a departure from the usual approach in understanding the event from the perspective of singularity and,using Badiou as the starting point of his criticism,demonstrated the mysteriousness of the cause and the metaphysical crux,the two features underlying the singularity of event.As a result,he forthrightly put forward his“against the event”viewpoint and absorbed relevant critical theories while explaining how Flaubert and other writers deal with the conflict between interruption and repetition,thus creating a pioneering presentation of the modernist narrative.His interpretation can not only provide a deduction of“the daily constancy of coincidence”,but also help clarify,in depth,a turning point in academic history,that is,the time when early modernist writers highlighted the structure of discourse itself in their works and Saussure established the starting point for the theory of language simultaneously.

关 键 词：反事件 独特性 现代主义 日常性 语言论 

分 类 号：I106.4[文学—世界文学]