检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨国超[1] 芮萌[2] YANG Guochao;RUI Men(School of Accounting&Institute of Income Distribution and Public Finance,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;China Europe International Business School)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学会计学院、收入分配与现代财政研究院,430073 [2]中欧国际工商学院,201206
出 处:《经济研究》2020年第9期174-191,共18页Economic Research Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71702192);高等学校学科创新引智计划(B20084);中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2722020JCT023);后期资助项目(2722020YJ030)的支持。
摘 要:理论上是否需要由政府来制定产业政策仍存在争议。本文基于2008年开始实施的《高新技术企业认定管理办法》这一具体的产业政策,研究产业政策实施中的激励效应与迎合效应。研究发现,公司获得高新技术企业认定后,其创新投入以及创新产出的数量和质量均显著提升,但通过虚增研发投入而获得高新技术企业认定的公司,其创新投入以及创新产出的数量和质量均提升较少。这表明产业政策既可能会激励公司创新,也可能导致公司仅仅为表面迎合政策要求,而无意于真正从事创新。机制分析结果还发现,通过高新技术企业认定的企业可以获得更多的税收优惠和政府补助,也会聘请更多高学历的员工,但产业政策所带来的减税优惠、政府补助以及人才聚集效应只会促进真正的高新技术企业增加创新,而对于“伪高新技术企业”,产业政策的创新激励作用显著减弱。本文研究结论不仅协调了“产业政策之争”双方所持的不同理论观点,也为政府如何实施产业政策提供了理论参考。R&D plays a crucial role in economic growth.However,whether the government should formulate industrial policies to stimulate R&D is still a highly controversial topic.First,R&D is associated with a strong externality(i.e.the R&D output of an enterprise often spills over into other companies in the same industry,as well as in other industries).Companies often become reluctant to increase R&D investment because of externality(Arrow,1962).In addition,the uncertainties associated with R&D are so high that banks are unwilling to provide loans for high-risk firms.Thus,the government needs to develop industrial policies to provide firms with incentives to increase R&D investment to overcome market dysfunction.Second,the Austrian School believes that the government is not smarter than the market because of cognitive limitations and information asymmetry.The government cannot accurately identify which industries need to be guided by industrial policies,nor can it differentiate pseudo-innovators from authentic innovators without any cost.In other words,the government may also fail.This paper takes advantage of the specific industry policy of China's“Regulation on the Identification of High-tech Enterprises”as the empirical setting to study the economic consequences of industrial policy implementation to provide micro-level evidence for the dispute on industrial policy.Tax incentives and government subsidies are the main policy tools used to compensate for R&D externalities and stimulate R&D investment.First,lowering the corporate income tax rate enables enterprises to better internalize the economic benefits of R&D,and providing certain subsidies reduces the marginal cost of R&D failures.Both tools encourage enterprises to increase R&D investment.Moreover,incentives such as tax cuts and subsidies can ease the financial constraints caused by a company's innovation and enable high-skilled labor to cluster in high-tech enterprises.Second,to obtain preferential policies,enterprises may choose to release“false innovation
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44