检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁倩[1,2] 王兆琪[1] 张永欣 DING Qian;WANG Zhao-qi;ZHANG Yong-xin(School of Education Science,Xinyang Normal University,Xinyang 464000,China;China Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior,Ministry of Education,Wuhan 430079,China)
机构地区:[1]信阳师范学院教育科学学院,信阳464000 [2]青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉430079
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2020年第5期942-945,896,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJCZH021);青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室开放课题(2018A03);国家社会科学基金重点项目(18ASH012);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目(2019CJY034);河南省高等学校哲学社会科学创新团队支持计划(2018-CXTD-04);河南省高等学校哲学社会科学研究应用研究重大项目(2019-YYZD-14);信阳师范学院“南湖学者奖励计划”青年项目。
摘 要:目的:对Roberts和David编制的伴侣低头行为量表在我国青少年群体中进行改编和修订,使之适用于父母低头行为的测量。方法:在中小学生群体中发放问卷1543份,回收有效问卷1484份,6个月后随机抽取282名中学生进行重测;采用粗暴养育量表、父母温暖问卷、父母拒绝问卷和手机成瘾量表作为效标。结果:探索性因素分析得到1个公因子,累积方差贡献率为54.239%。验证性因素分析显示,单因子结构模型拟合良好(χ2^/df=2.579,RMSEA=0.061,RMR=0.053,NFI=0.939,RFI=0.916,IFI=0.962,TLI=0.947,GFI=0.966,CFI=0.962);3个样本测量的内部一致性信度在0.826~0.885之间,重测信度为0.829。相关分析表明,父母低头行为与粗暴养育(r=0.408,P<0.001)、父母拒绝(r=0.434,P<0.001)、青少年手机成瘾(r=0.232,P<0.001)显著正相关,与父母温暖(r=-0.280,P<0.001)显著负相关。结论:修订后的中文版父母低头行为量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为我国青少年父母低头行为的测量工具。Objective:To revise the Partner Phubbing Scale to Parents Phubbing Scale,and examine its reliability and validity in Chinese adolescents.Methods:A total sample of 1484 adolescents wasrecruited to complete the Chinese version of Parents Phubbing Scale,and 282 subjects of the pretest sample were randomly retested with 6 months interval.At the same time,the Harsh Parenting Scale(HPS),the Parental Warm Questionnaire(PWQ),the Parental Rejection Questionnaire(PRQ)and Mobile Phone Addiction Scale(MPAS)were used as the criterion.Results:The exploratory factor analysis showed Parents Phubbing Scale consisted of one factor,accounting for 54.239%of the total variance.The confirmatory factor analysis identified one factor model,and the model fit data was well(χ2^/df=2.579,RMSEA=0.061,RMR=0.053,NFI=0.939,RFI=0.916,IFI=0.962,TLI=0.947,GFI=0.966,CFI=0.962).And the reliability coefficients of 3 samples ranged from 0.826 to 0.885,the test-retest reliability was 0.829.The total score of Parents Phubbing Scale was positively correlated with scores of HPS(r=0.408,P<0.001),PRQ(r=0.434,P<0.001)and MPAS(r=0.232,P<0.001),and negatively correlated with scores of PWQ(r=-0.280,P<0.001).Conclusion:The Chinese version of Parents Phubbing Scale has good validity and reliability,which can be used as an effective instrument to assess parents’phubbing in Chinese adolescents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13