关于当前学科评估改革的多维思考  

Multidimensional thinking on the reform of discipline evaluation

作　　者：靳玉乐[1] 胡建华[2] 陈鹏[3] 陈廷柱[4] 陈亮 

机构地区：[1]西南大学教育学部 [2]南京师范大学教育科学学院 [3]陕西师范大学教育学院 [4]华中科技大学教育科学研究院

出　　处：《高校教育管理》2020年第5期1-14,共14页Journal of Higher Education Management

基　　金：国家社会科学基金教育学国家重大课题(VIA170003);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(18JZD049);中国博士后科学基金第13批特别资助(2020T130392)。

摘　　要：学科评估作为学科建设的有力支点,在整个学科发展中扮演着重要的角色。为更好地发挥学科评估的监督、警示、激励等作用,最大限度实现以评促建的功能,我们需要从以下五个方面进行反思。第一,学科评估应重视学科自身的发展属性,立足学科建设的现实境遇,突出学科发展的创新性、多样性、开放性和包容性,构建个性化的评估新机制。第二,学科评估的改变在评估之外,降低热度、重视内在应成为进一步深入认识学科评估作用的关键。第三,第五轮学科评估需要避免唯科学主义的价值取向,深化分类评估,坚持"以本为本""立德树人"理念,关注"差异公平"问题。第四,学科评估之后,教育部学位与研究生教育发展研究中心应协同多方部门提供高质量的学科发展报告,提升学科评估的社会认同与实际效用。第五,培育独立于政府行政设计的第三方学科评估组织,探究其生长与运行的内在逻辑、组织特征等能够最大限度地发挥其客观评价、组织协调与优化整合的功能。唯有如此,我们才能更加有效地推进学科评估现代化进程,真正释放以评促建的正义能量。As a powerful fulcrum of discipline construction,discipline evaluation plays an important role in the whole discipline development.In order to give better play to the role of supervision,warning and incentive of discipline evaluation,and maximize the function of promoting construction by evaluation,we need to reflect from the following five aspects.First,discipline evaluation should attach importance to the development of the discipline itself,be based on the actual situation of discipline construction,highlight the innovation,diversity,openness and inclusiveness of discipline development,and construct a new personalized evaluation mechanism.Second,the change of discipline evaluation is beyond itself,and reducing the popularity and paying attention to the internal should be the key to further understanding the role of discipline assessment.Third,the fifth round of discipline evaluation needs to avoid the value orientation of scientism,deepen the classification evaluation,adhere to concepts of " taking undergraduate education as the fundamental" " fostering virtue through education",and pay attention to differences and fairness.Fourth,China Academic Degrees and Graduate Education Development Center should cooperate with various departments to provide high-quality discipline development reports after discipline evaluation,so as to enhance social identity and practical effectiveness of discipline evaluation.Fifth,we should cultivate the third-party discipline evaluation organization independent of the government administrative design,and explore the internal logic and organizational characteristics of its growth and operation,which could maximize its functions of objective evaluation,organizational coordination and optimization and integration.Only in this way can we effectively promote the modernization of subject evaluation and truly release the energy of evaluation for construction.

关 键 词：学科评估 评价指标 个性化发展 关键维度 学科发展报告 第三方学科评估组织 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]