检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者: 叶琳(译)[2] Oyane Satoshi
机构地区:[1]日本同志社大学 [2]中国社会科学院日本研究所
出 处:《日本学刊》2020年第5期127-158,共32页Japanese Studies
摘 要:日美经贸摩擦曾长期且多领域存在,并催生了激烈的政治性对立。历史上,三种类型的日美经贸摩擦几乎是相继发生的,其演变过程反映了宏观层面的国际结构性变化,也展示了其政治解决过程与基本模式。中美经贸摩擦和日美经贸摩擦一样,都出现了经济问题政治化的现象,而且经贸摩擦无法利用世贸组织的多边机制从法律层面加以解决,需要两国政府通过磋商寻求政治解决,但又存在明显不同。考察日美经贸摩擦发展及政治解决过程的经验教训,可资中美解决经贸摩擦参考。Japan-U.S.trade friction has existed for a long time and in many fields,resulting in fierce political confrontation.In the history,there are three types trade friction between Japan and the U.S.that have occurred almost one after another,which reflects the intertnational structural changes as well as the process and fundemental model of political solution of the friction.In the trade friction between China and the U.S.,like that between Japan and the U.S.,there are politicization of economic problems,and the trade friction can not be solved from the legal level throughout the multilateral mechanism of the WTO and demand bilateral negotiation.The investigation of Japan’s experience in Japan-U.S.trade friction can provide some reference for the solution of economic and trade friction between China and the U.S..
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.59.191